Banning Catcher in the Rye Essay

The backstop in the Rye by J. D. Salinger should non be banned in schools based solely on the concomitant that it is a controversial book that uses harsh language and depend uponual references. This book is J. D. Salingers freedom of speech, and it is a infringement of the first amendment for schools to ban this book. This book is scarcely fling an inside look into what striplings go through with(predicate) in some point of their lives. gibe to the Los Angeles Times, The Catcher in the Ryes, denunciation and cozy references drew scandalized reactions (Rotella 18). Although this book has m whatever another(prenominal) sexual references, it is not in any way as explicit and as bad as what teenagers see and figure nowadays on television and in the world. Holden occasionally thinks and talks about sex Most guys at Pencey talked about having sexual intercourse with girls all the time. (Salinger 48).The average teenager often thinks and talks about sex. It is not unusual for teenagers to do this. The profanity in this book is also not as bad as it may seem. bar Salazar, a concerned mother and religious activist, claims that, It uses the Lords name in vain 200 times (Rotella 17), that the curse words used in The Catcher in the Rye ar nothing that teenagers have not hear before in their everyday lives. criminalise The Catcher in the Rye in school is not acceptable.It is a violation of the first amendment, and it is nothing far from what teenagers copse everyday. This book gives teenagers someone in literature that they are able to relate to in one way or another. The Catcher in the Rye is not a book that will corrupt vernal readers. The underlying theme of this book is discharge of innocence. This loss occurs when a teenager makes the swap to adulthood where he or she is obscured by phoniness. By banning this book from schools, the only thing that teenagers would be sheltered from is reality.